The underlying assumptions of traditional autoregressive models are well known. The resulting complexity with these models leads to observations such as,
``We have found that choosing the wrong model or parameters can often yield poor results, and it is unlikely that even experienced analysts can choose the correct model and parameters efficiently given this array of choices.’’
NNS
simplifies the forecasting process. Below are some
examples demonstrating NNS.ARMA
and its
assumption free, minimal parameter forecasting
method.
NNS.ARMA
has the ability to fit a
linear regression to the relevant component series, yielding very fast
results. For our running example we will use the
AirPassengers
dataset loaded in base R.
We will forecast 44 periods h = 44
of
AirPassengers
using the first 100 observations
training.set = 100
, returning estimates of the final 44
observations. We will then test this against our validation set of
tail(AirPassengers,44)
.
Since this is monthly data, we will try a
seasonal.factor = 12
.
Below is the linear fit and associated root mean squared error (RMSE)
using method = "lin"
.
nns_lin = NNS.ARMA(AirPassengers,
h = 44,
training.set = 100,
method = "lin",
plot = TRUE,
seasonal.factor = 12,
seasonal.plot = FALSE)
## [1] 35.39965
Now we can try using a nonlinear regression on the relevant component
series using method = "nonlin"
.
We can test a series of seasonal.factors
and select the
best one to fit. The largest period to consider would be
0.5 * length(variable)
, since we need more than 2 points
for a regression! Remember, we are testing the first 100 observations of
AirPassengers
, not the full 144 observations.
seas = t(sapply(1 : 25, function(i) c(i, sqrt( mean( (NNS.ARMA(AirPassengers, h = 44, training.set = 100, method = "lin", seasonal.factor = i, plot=FALSE) - tail(AirPassengers, 44)) ^ 2) ) ) ) )
colnames(seas) = c("Period", "RMSE")
seas
## Period RMSE
## [1,] 1 75.67783
## [2,] 2 75.71250
## [3,] 3 75.87604
## [4,] 4 75.16563
## [5,] 5 76.07418
## [6,] 6 70.43185
## [7,] 7 77.98493
## [8,] 8 75.48997
## [9,] 9 79.16378
## [10,] 10 81.47260
## [11,] 11 106.56886
## [12,] 12 35.39965
## [13,] 13 90.98265
## [14,] 14 95.64979
## [15,] 15 82.05345
## [16,] 16 74.63052
## [17,] 17 87.54036
## [18,] 18 74.90881
## [19,] 19 96.96011
## [20,] 20 88.75015
## [21,] 21 100.21346
## [22,] 22 108.68674
## [23,] 23 85.06430
## [24,] 24 35.49018
## [25,] 25 75.16192
Now we know seasonal.factor = 12
is our best fit, we can
see if there’s any benefit from using a nonlinear regression.
Alternatively, we can define our best fit as the corresponding
seas$Period
entry of the minimum value in our
seas$RMSE
column.
Below you will notice the use of seasonal.factor = a
generates the same output.
nns = NNS.ARMA(AirPassengers,
h = 44,
training.set = 100,
method = "nonlin",
seasonal.factor = a,
plot = TRUE, seasonal.plot = FALSE)
## [1] 18.15208
Note: You may experience instances with monthly data
that report seasonal.factor
close to multiples of 3, 4, 6
or 12. For instance, if the reported
seasonal.factor = {37, 47, 71, 73}
use
(seasonal.factor = c(36, 48, 72))
by setting the
modulo
parameter in
NNS.seas(..., modulo = 12)
. The same
suggestion holds for daily data and multiples of 7, or any other time
series with logically inferred cyclical patterns. The nearest periods to
that modulo
will be in the expanded output.
## $all.periods
## Period Coefficient.of.Variation Variable.Coefficient.of.Variation
## 1: 48 0.4002249 0.4279947
## 2: 12 0.4059923 0.4279947
## 3: 60 0.4279947 0.4279947
## 4: 36 0.4279947 0.4279947
## 5: 24 0.4279947 0.4279947
##
## $best.period
## Period
## 48
##
## $periods
## [1] 48 12 60 36 24
seasonal.factor
NNS also offers a wrapper function
NNS.ARMA.optim()
to test a given vector of
seasonal.factor
and returns the optimized objective
function (in this case RMSE written as
obj.fn = expression( sqrt(mean((predicted - actual)^2)) )
)
and the corresponding periods, as well as the
NNS.ARMA
regression method used.
Alternatively, using external package objective functions work as well
such as
obj.fn = expression(Metrics::rmse(actual, predicted))
.
NNS.ARMA.optim()
will also test whether
to regress the underlying data first, shrink
the estimates
to their subset mean values, include a bias.shift
based on
its internal validation errors, and compare different
weights
of both linear and nonlinear estimates.
Given our monthly dataset, we will try multiple years by setting
seasonal.factor = seq(12, 60, 6)
every 6 months based on
our NNS.seas() insights above.
nns.optimal = NNS.ARMA.optim(AirPassengers,
training.set = 100,
seasonal.factor = seq(12, 60, 6),
obj.fn = expression( sqrt(mean((predicted - actual)^2)) ),
objective = "min",
pred.int = .95, plot = TRUE)
nns.optimal
[1] "CURRNET METHOD: lin"
[1] "COPY LATEST PARAMETERS DIRECTLY FOR NNS.ARMA() IF ERROR:"
[1] "NNS.ARMA(... method = 'lin' , seasonal.factor = c( 12 ) ...)"
[1] "CURRENT lin OBJECTIVE FUNCTION = 35.3996540135277"
[1] "BEST method = 'lin', seasonal.factor = c( 12 )"
[1] "BEST lin OBJECTIVE FUNCTION = 35.3996540135277"
[1] "CURRNET METHOD: nonlin"
[1] "COPY LATEST PARAMETERS DIRECTLY FOR NNS.ARMA() IF ERROR:"
[1] "NNS.ARMA(... method = 'nonlin' , seasonal.factor = c( 12 ) ...)"
[1] "CURRENT nonlin OBJECTIVE FUNCTION = 18.1435264878535"
[1] "BEST method = 'nonlin' PATH MEMBER = c( 12 )"
[1] "BEST nonlin OBJECTIVE FUNCTION = 18.1435264878535"
[1] "CURRNET METHOD: both"
[1] "COPY LATEST PARAMETERS DIRECTLY FOR NNS.ARMA() IF ERROR:"
[1] "NNS.ARMA(... method = 'both' , seasonal.factor = c( 12 ) ...)"
[1] "CURRENT both OBJECTIVE FUNCTION = 20.8560044654062"
[1] "BEST method = 'both' PATH MEMBER = c( 12 )"
[1] "BEST both OBJECTIVE FUNCTION = 20.8560044654062"
$periods
[1] 12
$weights
NULL
$obj.fn
[1] 18.15208
$method
[1] "nonlin"
$shrink
[1] FALSE
$nns.regress
[1] FALSE
$bias.shift
[1] -8.576982
$errors
[1] -5.6787879 -5.2833333 -4.1616162 -17.7909091 -10.3838384 -8.8636364 -7.4526316 3.9393939 7.4882812 12.3750000 29.1132812 34.3281250 20.2205492
[14] 27.6022786 20.8336687 -8.4665838 30.8449534 12.9914773 17.5563939 38.3826941 19.2903993 17.4644272 19.3331767 19.8155057 -3.4480488 35.5619032
[27] 13.5978472 -16.1723154 12.1689345 -0.7539891 -5.0831451 5.9867956 -3.9068174 -0.7986170 42.1995863 -10.1324609 -19.3155737 19.8071364 -8.0478172
[40] -14.4690520 9.3426681 -20.0538349 -2.4281117 14.8998761
$results
[1] 340.7442 408.1397 452.2614 440.6321 385.0392 329.5594 288.9704 331.3624 338.9113 321.7980 382.5363 373.7511 374.6436 454.0253 503.2567 487.9564 426.2680
[18] 363.4145 318.9794 366.8057 370.7134 350.8874 416.7562 407.2385 407.9750 498.9849 553.0209 534.2507 466.5920 397.6690 348.3399 402.4098 404.5162 381.6244
[35] 452.6226 442.2906 444.1074 546.2302 605.3752 582.9540 508.7657 432.3692 378.9949 438.3229
$lower.pred.int
[1] 293.9961 361.3916 405.5133 393.8840 338.2911 282.8113 242.2223 284.6143 292.1632 275.0499 335.7882 327.0030 327.8955 407.2772 456.5086 441.2083 379.5199
[18] 316.6664 272.2313 320.0576 323.9653 304.1393 370.0081 360.4904 361.2269 452.2368 506.2727 487.5026 419.8438 350.9209 301.5918 355.6617 357.7681 334.8763
[35] 405.8745 395.5424 397.3593 499.4820 558.6271 536.2058 462.0176 385.6211 332.2468 391.5748
$upper.pred.int
[1] 387.4923 454.8878 499.0095 487.3802 431.7873 376.3075 335.7185 378.1105 385.6594 368.5461 429.2844 420.4993 421.3917 500.7734 550.0048 534.7046 473.0161
[18] 410.1626 365.7275 413.5538 417.4615 397.6356 463.5043 453.9866 454.7231 545.7330 599.7690 580.9988 513.3401 444.4171 395.0880 449.1579 451.2643 428.3725
[35] 499.3707 489.0387 490.8556 592.9783 652.1233 629.7021 555.5138 479.1173 425.7430 485.0710
We can forecast another 50 periods out-of-sample
(h = 50
), by dropping the training.set
parameter while generating the 95% prediction intervals.
NNS.ARMA.optim(AirPassengers,
seasonal.factor = seq(12, 60, 6),
obj.fn = expression( sqrt(mean((predicted - actual)^2)) ),
objective = "min",
pred.int = .95, h = 50, plot = TRUE)
seasonal.factor = c(1, 2, ...)
We included the ability to use any number of specified seasonal periods simultaneously, weighted by their strength of seasonality. Computationally expensive when used with nonlinear regressions and large numbers of relevant periods.
weights
Instead of weighting by the seasonal.factor
strength of
seasonality, we offer the ability to weight each per any defined
compatible vector summing to 1.
Equal weighting would be weights = "equal"
.
pred.int
Provides the values for the specified prediction intervals within [0,1] for each forecasted point and plots the bootstrapped replicates for the forecasted points.
seasonal.factor = FALSE
We also included the ability to use all detected seasonal periods simultaneously, weighted by their strength of seasonality. Computationally expensive when used with nonlinear regressions and large numbers of relevant periods.
best.periods
This parameter restricts the number of detected seasonal periods to
use, again, weighted by their strength. To be used in conjunction with
seasonal.factor = FALSE
.
modulo
To be used in conjunction with seasonal.factor = FALSE
.
This parameter will ensure logical seasonal patterns (i.e.,
modulo = 7
for daily data) are included along with the
results.
mod.only
To be used in conjunction with
seasonal.factor = FALSE & modulo != NULL
. This
parameter will ensure empirical patterns are kept along with the logical
seasonal patterns.
dynamic = TRUE
This setting generates a new seasonal period(s) using the estimated
values as continuations of the variable, either with or without a
training.set
. Also computationally expensive due to the
recalculation of seasonal periods for each estimated value.
plot
, seasonal.plot
These are the plotting arguments, easily enabled or disabled with
TRUE
or FALSE
.
seasonal.plot = TRUE
will not plot without
plot = TRUE
. If a seasonal analysis is all that is desired,
NNS.seas
is the function specifically suited for that
task.
The extension to a generalized multivariate instance is provided in
the following documentation of the
NNS.VAR()
function:
If the user is so motivated, detailed arguments and proofs are provided within the following: