=====
From chipr@niestu.com:
Pretty image, but like most of your others, without feeling.  Next time, go
for more quality, less quantity.  Also, no description, no tech merit.

=====
From sroberts@learn.senecac.on.ca:
*VERY* cool picture.  Gave you the ol' triple-twenty treatment, I liked it so much.

=====
From tholal@bga.com:
You submit too many incredible images. 

=====
From bill.marrs@pureatria.com:
Stunning realism
=====
From klynn@minn.net:

Very nice image! Please be sure to fill out all fields in the submission 
form (hardware?  renderer?
=====
From 93semeno@scar.utoronto.ca:
The best image in the competition. I would have given it higher marks if you said what you used to create it. :(

=====
From ucoakc00@mcl.ucsb.edu:
Be more origional in the future.


=====
From danclegg@uniserve.com:
Pick 1 scene and make it good naxos!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



=====
From Matthew_L_Ziegler@hill-top.com:
Very Busy, but also excellent

=====
From rea@st-and.ac.uk:
This is a rather nice idea.   Unfortunately, I feel that you slightly
`overcrowded' the image, which seems to put the eye off.   Toned down a 
little, this would be an excellent image.

=====
From mwhite@redshift.com:
Super design and lots of objects together make this one of the best. Nicely Done

=====
From wyvern@u.washington.edu:
It's gorgeous...  But a little too busy.

=====
From uvasst00@mcl.ucsb.edu:
Oh boy, hundreds of the same glass...

=====
From no13@ozemail.com.au:
Top stuff !

=====
From ptdawson@voicenet.com:
This image just makes me weep! :-) It is sooooooo nice! 20-20-20!

=====
From lpurple@netcom.com:
Very photorealistic. The green edges on the glass shelves is a nice touch.

=====
From dick@buckosoft.com:
Photographic quality...
I think i've been to this bar.
Excellent colors.




From web_user@p5-01.z03.glo.be:
Notable for lighting, composition, modelling, originality, textures