=====
From roth@ens.ascom.ch:
Nice sky, unfortunately it's painted, not rendered
It seems as if the main rope has the form of a partial cosine wave, which
would be wrong.
=====
From djconnel@flash.net:

The subject is interesting and topical, but the focus of the image is
wrong -- the camera is pointed to the right, and the cranes are
so small they don't seem important.  The sky is interesting,
but seems a bit abstract in comparison to the realistic bridge.  The
water is nicely done.  The composition could also use a little
work... the scene is a little empty.  This could be helped
simply by changing the camera properties.


=====
From castlewrks@aol.com:
It would have been nice to have seen the bridge from a perspective that
allowed you to see the size of the bridge with rivits and other details
in the foreground while the bridge fades off into the distance.
=====
From up@ct.heise.de:
looks nice - but there's a problem with the cables

=====
From sonya_roberts@geocities.com:
Interesting.  I like the sky texture.  The bridge is nicely done.

=====
From kosh@nesys.com:
The suspension cables appear to have a reverse curve which is not possible.
Beautiful scene, though...


=====
From kaustin@tgn.net:
I like the sky and fog quite a bit, the varying thickness was handled well.
The nearest concrete support seems a little flat, but other than this
the image is rather good. A few more details (boats? birds?) could have
added a bit more depth. Glad to see people are still using Amigas.

=====
From chipr@niestu.com:
Nice scene, good use of atmosphere.

=====
From bill@apocalypse.org:
Nice composition and artistry

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
This looks like a painting!  Especially the sky.
Fine, artistic image.

=====
From arcana@sinbad.net:
A very nice image. I would have liked to have seen the buildings on the far
shore 
actually modelled, rather than rendered as an image map. Overall, though,
little
depth is lost in the image. The atmospheric affects help with that.

=====
From ethelm@bigfoot.com:
Attractive image.
The water looks unnatural, needs some 'turbulence'.
The nearer main suspension cables have a bit of 'wrong way' curve.

=====
From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de:
Nice to see another Amiga user still out there :)
I quite like the eoverall style, but I think the curves of the suspender cables
are not corect, they start with the steepest angle at the top. It would not
work otherwise. I think it made sense to render at that high resolution to
keep the vertical cables visible.

=====
From lpurple@netcom.com:
Overall kind of blurry and could use some more detail in the foreground.
(Maybe some riverbank weeds). Nice bridge model.


=====
From r@dial-up11.webbernet.net>:
A striking and moody image.  I would like it if the bridge was a bit sharper. 
Blending in as it does takes away the focus point and makes the eye concentrate
too much on the water.


=====
From r@ts6-14.hfx.istar.ca:
I love the fog
Notable for lighting