=====
From djconnel@flash.net:

The conveyor belt is nicely modeled and textured.  However, the bears
are a bit rough at the edges, and the concept is not really topical.
There is some nice use of texture, but the scene could use some enhancement.

=====
From castlewrks@aol.com:
Factory details are lacking making it difficult to
determine what it is the bears are playing on.
=====
From sonya_roberts@geocities.com:
Weird, but I like it.  The bears are rather oddly shaped, and the whole scene is rather speckly, but it gives it a "manipulated photograph" feel that is intriguing.
=====
From chipr@niestu.com:
The fuzzies are cute, but the picture isn't very coherent.  Also, too much
shiny stuff.  I do like the "fur" texture--pretty convincing.

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
Your best image to date.  Nice gritty textures, and a lively composition.

=====
From ethelm@bigfoot.com:
Very cute but without a written explanation, you would not know what it is.

=====
From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de:
I would have rated the image much better if you had left out the teddies. They
are really badly modelled.

=====
From lpurple@netcom.com:
The modelling could use more work; the conveyor belts look like solid slabs
of metal instead of flexible; and the rollers could use more detail. The teddy
bear heads also need to be de-squished. But it's a very original idea.


=====
From r@dial-up35.webbernet.net>:
Sorry, I just can't buy the weird, flatheaded angular bears.  It is good, given the setting, that you dirtied their fur.  I like the conveyor belt itself, but the gears/wheels at least, and preferably the whole background really need more detail.