<?xmlversion="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?> <!-- This template is for creating an Internet Draft using xml2rfc, which is available here: http://xml.resource.org. -->version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?> <!DOCTYPE rfc [ <!ENTITY nbsp " "> <!ENTITY zwsp "​"> <!ENTITY nbhy "‑"> <!ENTITY wj "⁠"> ]> <rfc xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" category="std" consensus="true" docName="draft-ietf-grow-bmp-bgp-rib-stats-17" number="9972" updates="" obsoletes="" tocInclude="true" symRefs="true" sortRefs="true" ipr="trust200902"submissionType="IETF"> <!-- category values: std, bcp, info, exp, and historic ipr values: full3667, noModification3667, noDerivatives3667 you can add the attributes updates="NNNN" and obsoletes="NNNN" they will automatically be output with "(if approved)" --> <!-- ***** FRONT MATTER ***** -->submissionType="IETF" version="3" xml:lang="en" > <front> <title abbrev="BMP New Statistics">Advanced BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) Statistics Types</title><!-- add 'role="editor"' below for the editors if appropriate --> <!-- Another author who claims to be an editor --><seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9972"/> <author fullname="Mukul Srivastava" initials="M." role="editor" surname="Srivastava"> <organization>Hewlett Packard Enterprise</organization> <address> <postal> <street>10 Technology Park Dr</street><!-- Reorder these if your country does things differently --><city>Westford</city> <region>MA</region> <code>01886</code><country>USA</country><country>United States of America</country> </postal> <email>mukul.srivastava@hpe.com</email><!-- uri and facsimile elements may also be added --></address> </author> <author fullname="Yisong Liu" initials="Y." surname="Liu"> <organization>China Mobile</organization> <address> <postal> <street>32 Xuanwumen West Street</street><!-- Reorder these if your country does things differently --><city>Beijing</city> <region>Xicheng District</region> <code>100053</code> <country>China</country> </postal> <email>liuyisong@chinamobile.com</email><!-- uri and facsimile elements may also be added --></address> </author> <author fullname="Changwang Lin" initials="C." role="editor" surname="Lin"> <organization>New H3C Technologies</organization> <address> <postal> <street>8 Yongjia North Road</street><!-- Reorder these if your country does things differently --><city>Beijing</city> <region>Haidian District</region> <code>100094</code> <country>China</country> </postal> <email>linchangwang.04414@h3c.com</email><!-- uri and facsimile elements may also be added --></address> </author> <author fullname="Jinming Li" initials="J." surname="Li"> <organization>China Mobile</organization> <address> <postal> <street>32 Xuanwumen West Street</street><!-- Reorder these if your country does things differently --><city>Beijing</city> <region>Xicheng District</region> <code>100053</code> <country>China</country> </postal> <email>lijinming@chinamobile.com</email><!-- uri and facsimile elements may also be added --></address> </author> <dateyear="2025" /> <!-- Meta-data Declarations --> <area>General</area> <workgroup>GROW</workgroup>year="2026" month="May"/> <area>OPS</area> <workgroup>grow</workgroup> <keyword>IDR</keyword> <keyword>GROW</keyword> <keyword>BGP</keyword> <keyword>BMP</keyword> <abstract><t>RFC 7854 defines different<t>The BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) described in RFC 7854 defines statistics message types to observe events that occur on a monitored router. This document defines new statisticstypetypes to monitor BMPAdj-RIB-InAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In andAdj-RIB-OutAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;Out Routing Information Bases (RIBs).</t> </abstract> </front> <middle> <sectionanchor="introduction" title="Introduction"> <t>Section 4.8 of <xref target="RFC7854" />anchor="introduction"> <name>Introduction</name> <t><xref section="4.8" target="RFC7854"/> defines a number of different BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) statistics types to observe major events that occur on a monitored router.StatsStatistics are either counters orgauges. Section 6.2 ofGauges. <xreftarget="RFC8671" />section="6.2" target="RFC8671"/> also defines several BMP statistics types forAdj-RIB-OutAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;Out of a monitored router.</t> <t>New BMP statistics types are needed to enablemore refinedmore-refined BGP route monitoring andanalysis, improvinganalysis to improve operational maintenance and troubleshooting capabilities.</t> <t>This document definesgaugesGauges for new BMP statistics. The applicability scope of these newgauges (Adj-RIB-In, Adj-RIB-Out,Gauges (Adj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In, Adj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;Out, Loc-RIB) is provided inSection 4.<xref target="Application_Scope_of_Statistics"/>. The format of the BMPstatisticsStatistics Report message remains the same as defined in <xreftarget="RFC7854" />.</t> <section title="Requirements Language"> <t>Thetarget="RFC7854"/>.</t> <section> <name>Requirements Language</name> <t> The key words"MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY","<bcp14>MUST</bcp14>", "<bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHALL</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHALL NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14>", "<bcp14>NOT RECOMMENDED</bcp14>", "<bcp14>MAY</bcp14>", and"OPTIONAL""<bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14>" in this document are to be interpreted as described inBCP 14BCP 14 <xreftarget="RFC2119" />target="RFC2119"/> <xreftarget="RFC8174" />target="RFC8174"/> when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.The BCP14 is</t> <aside><t>Note that the key words are used to stress importance foroperators butoperations; they are not required as a formal implementationrequirement.</t>requirement.</t></aside> </section> </section><section title="Terminology"><section> <name>Terminology</name> <t>This document makes use of the following terms:<list style="symbols"> <t>Adj-RIB-In: As</t> <dl spacing="normal" newline="false"> <dt>Adj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In:</dt><dd><t>As defined in <xreftarget="RFC4271" />, "Thesection="1.1" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC4271"/>:</t> <blockquote>The Adj-RIBs-In contains unprocessed routing information that has been advertised to the local BGP speaker by itspeers."</t> <t>Pre-policy Adj-RIB-In: Thepeers.</blockquote></dd> <dt>Pre-policy Adj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In:</dt><dd>The result before applying the inbound policy to anAdj-RIB-In.Adj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In. Note that this is an explicit definition that aligns with the pre-policyAdj-RIB-InAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In concept specified inSection 2 of<xreftarget="RFC7854" />.</t> <t>Post-policy Adj-RIB-In: Assection="2" target="RFC7854"/>.</dd> <dt>Post-policy Adj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In:</dt><dd><t>As defined inSection 2 of<xreftarget="RFC7854" />.</t> <t>Adj-RIB-Out: Assection="2" target="RFC7854"/>:</t><blockquote>The result of applying inbound policy to an Adj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In, but prior to the application of route selection to form the Loc-RIB.</blockquote></dd> <dt>Adj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;Out:</dt><dd><t>As defined in <xreftarget="RFC4271" />, "Thesection="1.1" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC4271"/>:</t><blockquote>The Adj-RIBs-Out contains the routes for advertisement to specific peers by means of the local speaker's UPDATEmessages."</t> <t>Pre-policy Adj-RIB-Out: Asmessages.</blockquote></dd> <dt>Pre-policy Adj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;Out:</dt><dd><t>As defined inSection 3 of<xreftarget="RFC8671" />.</t> <t>Post-policy Adj-RIB-Out: Assection="3" target="RFC8671"/>:</t><blockquote>The result before applying the outbound policy to an Adj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;Out. This normally would match what is in the local RIB.</blockquote></dd> <dt>Post-policy Adj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;Out:</dt><dd><t>As defined inSection 3 of<xreftarget="RFC8671" />.</t> <t>Loc-RIB: Assection="3" target="RFC8671"/>:</t><blockquote>The result of applying outbound policy to an Adj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;Out. This <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> convey to the BMP receiver what is actually transmitted to the peer.</blockquote></dd> <dt>Loc-RIB:</dt><dd><t>As defined inSection 1.1 of<xreftarget="RFC4271" />, "Thesection="1.1" target="RFC4271"/>:</t><blockquote>The Loc-RIB contains the routes that have been selected by the local BGP speaker's DecisionProcess." NoteProcess.</blockquote><t>Note that the Loc-RIB state as monitored through BMP might also contain routes imported from other routing protocols such as an IGP or local staticroutes.</t> <t>Route: Asroutes.</t></dd> <dt>Route:</dt><dd><t>As defined inSection 1.1 of<xreftarget="RFC4271" />.</t> </list></t>section="1.1" target="RFC4271"/>:</t><blockquote>A unit of information that pairs a set of destinations with the attributes of a path to those destinations.</blockquote></dd> </dl> <t>The terms"Producer""producer" and"Collector""collector" are equivalent to"Monitored Router""monitored router" and"Monitoring Station","monitoring station", respectively. Also, "implementation"is used followingfollows the same usage as in <xreftarget="RFC7854" />.</t>target="RFC7854"/>.</t> </section> <sectionanchor="Stats" title="RIBanchor="Stats"> <name>RIB MonitoringStatistics">Statistics</name> <t>This section defines different statisticstypetypes forAdj-RIB-InAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In andAdj-RIB-OutAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;Out monitoringtype.types. Some of these statistics are also applicable to Loc-RIB; refer toSection 4<xref target="Application_Scope_of_Statistics"/> for more details.</t> <sectionanchor="stats-format" title="Statistics Format">anchor="stats-format"> <name>Statistics Format</name> <t>The BMP Statistics ReportMessagemessage carries statistic information in Type-Length-Value (TLV) formats. EachStatisticstatistic is encoded as a TLV (Stat Type, Stat Len, Stat Data)(Section 4.8 of(see <xreftarget="RFC7854" />).section="4.8" target="RFC7854"/>). "Stat Data" is being referred to as "value" when defining various RIB Monitoring Statistics.</t> <t>Statistics defined in this document can be categorized into two granularities: Global Statistics andPer-Address Family Identifier (AFI)/Subsequent Address Family Identifier (SAFI)Per-AFI/SAFI (see <xreftarget="RFC4760" />target="RFC4760"/>) Statistics. Statistics defined with Per-AFI/SAFI descriptions belong to Per-AFI/SAFI Statistics, while other statistics belong to Global Statistics. BothaGlobalStatisticStatistics anditstheir corresponding Per-AFI/SAFI Statistics can be reported simultaneously.</t> <t>The Per-AFI/SAFI Statistics apply only to theAFI/SAFIsAFI/SAFI that a BGP speaker supports and negotiates with its peer. The authoritative registries for AFI/SAFI values are maintained by IANA (see <xreftarget="IANA-AFI" />target="IANA-AFI"/> and <xreftarget="IANA-SAFI" />.</t>target="IANA-SAFI"/>).</t> <t>For Global Statistics, the "Stat Data" (value) field is a single 64-bit unsigned integergauge withGauge where the "Stat Len"MUSTfield <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be set to 8. Each global statisticMUST<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> appear only once in a BMP Statistics ReportMessage.</t>message.</t> <t>For Per-AFI/SAFI Statistics, the "Stat Data" (value) field is a 11-byte structured value formattedas:as a 2-byte AFI, a 1-byte SAFI, and a 64-bit Gauge. The "Stat Len"MUST<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be set to 11. For any given per-AFI/SAFI Statistic, duplicate (AFI, SAFI) pairsMUST NOT<bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> appear within the same BMP Statistics ReportMessage.message. Per-AFI/SAFI statisticsMUST NOT<bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be included in the BMP Statistics ReportMessagemessage if there is no data to report for that AFI/SAFI.</t> <t>If statistics apply to the Loc-RIB, the "Peer Type" field in the Per-Peer Header of the corresponding BMP Statistics ReportMessage MUSTmessage <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be set to 3 (Loc-RIB Instance Peer) <xreftarget="RFC9069" />.target="RFC9069"/>. Otherwise, the "Peer Type"MUSTfield <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be set as defined inSection 4.2 of of<xref target="RFC7854"/>.</t>section="4.2"/>.</t> <t>A BMP implementationMUST<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> ignore unrecognizedstat typesStat Types upon receipt.</t> </section> <sectionanchor="adj-rib-in-stats" title="Adj-RIB-Inanchor="adj-rib-in-stats"> <name>Adj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In RIB Monitoring StatisticsDefinition"> <t> <list style="symbols"> <t>TypeDefinition</name> <dl spacing="normal" newline="true"> <dt>Type = 18: (64-bitGauge) CurrentGauge)</dt><dd>Current number of routes in the pre-policyAdj-RIB-In.Adj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In. ThisgaugeGauge is similar tostats typeStat Type 7 defined in <xreftarget="RFC7854" />target="RFC7854"/> and makes it explicitly for the pre-policyAdj-RIB-In.</t> <t>TypeAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In.</dd> <dt>Type = 19: (64-bitGauge) CurrentGauge)</dt><dd><t>Current number of routes in the per-AFI/SAFI pre-policyAdj-RIB-In.Adj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In. ThisgaugeGauge is similar tostats typeStat Type 9 defined inSection 4.8 of<xreftarget="RFC7854" />section="4.8" target="RFC7854"/> and makes it explicitly for the pre-policyAdj-RIB-In. TheAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In.</t><t>The value is structuredas:as a 2-byte AFI, a 1-byte SAFI,followed byand a 64-bitGauge.</t> <t>TypeGauge.</t></dd> <dt>Type = 20: (64-bitGauge) CurrentGauge)</dt><dd>Current number of routes in the post-policyAdj-RIB-In.</t> <t>TypeAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In.</dd> <dt>Type = 21: (64-bitGauge) CurrentGauge)</dt><dd><t>Current number of routes in the per-AFI/SAFI post-policyAdj-RIB-In. TheAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In.</t><t>The value is structuredas:as a 2-byte AFI, a 1-byte SAFI,followed byand a 64-bitGauge.</t> <t>TypeGauge.</t></dd> <dt>Type = 22: (64-bitGauge) CurrentGauge)</dt><dd> <t>Current number of routes in the per-AFI/SAFI pre-policyAdj-RIB-InAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In rejected by an inbound policy. ThisgaugeGauge is different fromstats typeStat Type 0 defined inSection 4.8 of<xref target="RFC7854"/>. The stats typesection="4.8"/>. Stat Type 0 is a32-counter which32-bit counter that is a monotonically increasingnumber, whilenumber; thestats typeStat Type 22 is a 64-bitgauge whichGauge that represents the current number of routes rejected by an inbound policy due to ongoing policy configurationchanges. Thechanges.</t><t>The value is structuredas:as a 2-byte AFI, a 1-byte SAFI,followed byand a 64-bitGauge.</t> <t>TypeGauge.</t></dd> <dt>Type = 23: (64-bitGauge) CurrentGauge)</dt><dd><t>Current number of routes in the per-AFI/SAFI post-policyAdj-RIB-InAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In accepted by an inboundpolicy. Thepolicy.</t><t>The value is structuredas:as a 2-byte AFI, a 1-byte SAFI,followed byand a 64-bitGauge.</t> <t>TypeGauge.</t></dd> <dt>Type = 26: (64-bitGauge) CurrentGauge)</dt><dd><t>Current number of routes in the per-AFI/SAFI post-policyAdj-RIB-InAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In or Loc-RIB suppressed by a configuredroute damping policy. Theroute-damping policy.</t><t>The value is structuredas:as a 2-byte AFI, a 1-byte SAFI,followed byand a 64-bitGauge. 'Suppressed'Gauge.</t><t>'Suppressed' refers to a routewhichthat has been declared suppressed by the BGP Route Flap Damping mechanism as described inSection 2.2 of<xreftarget="RFC2439" />.</t> <t>Typesection="2.2" target="RFC2439"/>.</t></dd> <dt>Type = 27: (64-bitGauge) CurrentGauge)</dt><dd><t>Current number of routes in the per-AFI/SAFI post-policyAdj-RIB-InAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In or Loc-RIB marked as stale by Graceful Restart (GR)events. Theevents.</t><t>The value is structuredas:as a 2-byte AFI, a 1-byte SAFI,followed byand a 64-bitGauge. 'Stale'Gauge.</t><t>'Stale' refers to a routewhichthat has been declared stale by the BGP GR mechanism as described inSection 4.1 of<xreftarget="RFC4724" />.</t> <t>Typesection="4.1" target="RFC4724"/>.</t></dd> <dt>Type = 28: (64-bitGauge) CurrentGauge)</dt><dd><t>Current number of routes in the per-AFI/SAFI post-policyAdj-RIB-InAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In or Loc-RIB marked as stale by Long-Lived Graceful Restart(LLGR). The(LLGR).</t><t>The value is structuredas:as a 2-byte AFI, a 1-byte SAFI,followed byand a 64-bitGauge. 'Stale'Gauge.</t><t>'Stale' refers to a routewhichthat has been declared stale by the BGP LLGR mechanism as described inSection 4.3 of<xreftarget="RFC9494" />.</t> <t>Typesection="4.3" target="RFC9494"/>.</t></dd> <dt>Type = 29: (64-bitGauge) CurrentGauge)</dt><dd>Current number of routes in the post-policyAdj-RIB-InAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In left before exceeding thereceived routereceived-route threshold as defined inSection 6.7 of<xreftarget="RFC4271" />.</t> <t>Typesection="6.7" target="RFC4271"/>.</dd> <dt>Type = 30: (64-bitGauge) CurrentGauge)</dt><dd><t>Current number of routes in the per-AFI/SAFI in post-policyAdj-RIB-InAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In left before exceeding thereceived routereceived-route thresholdwhichthat corresponds to the upper bound of per-AFI/SAFI accepted routes following the model defined inSection 6.7 of<xreftarget="RFC4271" />. Thesection="6.7" target="RFC4271"/>.</t><t>The value is structuredas:as a 2-byte AFI, a 1-byte SAFI,followed byand a 64-bitGauge.</t> <t>TypeGauge.</t></dd> <dt>Type = 31: (64-bitGauge) CurrentGauge)</dt><dd>Current number of routes in the post-policyAdj-RIB-InAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In or Loc-RIB left before exceeding a license-customized route threshold. If no such license is configured, or if the license does not impose a hard limit, this valueMUST NOT<bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> bereported.</t> <t>Typereported.</dd> <dt>Type = 32: (64-bitGauge) CurrentGauge)</dt><dd><t>Current number of routes in the per-AFI/SAFI post-policyAdj-RIB-InAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In or Loc-RIB left before exceeding a license-customized route threshold. If no such license is configured, or if the license does not impose a hard limit, this valueMUST NOT<bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> bereported. Thereported.</t><t>The value is structuredas:as a 2-byte AFI, a 1-byte SAFI,followed byand a 64-bitGauge.</t> <t>TypeGauge.</t></dd> <dt>Type = 33: (64-bitGauge) CurrentGauge)</dt><dd>Current number of routes in the pre-policyAdj-RIB-InAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In rejectedbydue to exceeding the maximum AS_PATH length supported by the localconfiguration.</t> <t>Typeconfiguration.</dd> <dt>Type = 34: (64-bitGauge) CurrentGauge)</dt><dd><t>Current number of routes in the per-AFI/SAFI in pre-policyAdj-RIB-InAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In rejectedbydue to exceeding the maximum AS_PATH length supported by the localconfiguration. Theconfiguration.</t><t>The value is structuredas:as a 2-byte AFI, a 1-byte SAFI,followed byand a 64-bitGauge.</t> <t>TypeGauge.</t></dd> <dt>Type = 35: (64-bitGauge) CurrentGauge)</dt><dd> <t>Current number of routes in the per-AFI/SAFI post-policyAdj-RIB-InAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In invalidated after verifying the route origin Autonomous System Number (ASN) through the Route Origin Authorization (ROA) of the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) <xreftarget="RFC6811" />.target="RFC6811"/>. This is the total number of routes invalidated due toorigin Autonomous System (AS) numbera mismatch of origin ASNs and a mismatch of prefixlength mismatch. Thelength.</t><t>The value is structuredas:as a 2-byte AFI, a 1-byte SAFI,followed byand a 64-bitGauge.</t> <t>TypeGauge.</t></dd> <dt>Type = 36: (64-bitGauge) CurrentGauge)</dt><dd><t>Current number of routes in the per-AFI/SAFI post-policyAdj-RIB-InAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In validatedbyafter verifying the route originAS numberASN through the ROA of the RPKI <xreftarget="RFC6811" />. Thetarget="RFC6811"/>.</t><t>The value is structuredas:as a 2-byte AFI, a 1-byte SAFI,followed byand a 64-bitGauge.</t> <t>TypeGauge.</t></dd> <dt>Type = 37: (64-bitGauge) CurrentGauge)</dt><dd><t>Current number of routes in the per-AFI/SAFI post-policyAdj-RIB-InAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In whose RPKI route origin validation state is NotFound due to the absence of a matching ROA of RPKI <xreftarget="RFC6811" />. Thetarget="RFC6811"/>.</t><t>The value is structuredas:as a 2-byte AFI, a 1-byte SAFI,followed byand a 64-bitGauge.</t> </list> </t>Gauge.</t></dd> </dl> </section> <sectionanchor="adj-rib-out-stats" title="Adj-RIB-Outanchor="adj-rib-out-stats"> <name>Adj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;Out RIB Monitoring StatisticsDefinition"> <t> <list style="symbols"> <t>TypeDefinition</name> <dl spacing="normal" newline="true"> <dt>Type = 38: (64-bitGauge) CurrentGauge)</dt><dd><t>Current number of routes in the per-AFI/SAFI pre-policyAdj-RIB-OutAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;Out rejected by an outbound policy. These routes are active routeswhichthat otherwise would have been advertised in the absence of an outbound policywhichthat rejectedthem. Thethem.</t> <t>The value is structuredas:as a 2-byte AFI, a 1-byte SAFI,followed byand a 64-bitGauge.</t> <t>TypeGauge.</t></dd> <dt>Type = 39: (64-bitGauge) CurrentGauge)</dt><dd>Current number of routes in the pre-policyAdj-RIB-OutAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;Out filtered due to the AS_PATH length exceeding the locally configuredmaximum.</t> <t>Typemaximum.</dd> <dt>Type = 40: (64-bitGauge) CurrentGauge)</dt><dd><t>Current number of routes in the per-AFI/SAFI pre-policyAdj-RIB-OutAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;Out filtered due to AS_PATH length exceeding the locally configuredmaximum. Themaximum.</t><t>The value is structuredas:as a 2-byte AFI, a 1-byte SAFI,followed byand a 64-bitGauge.</t> <t>TypeGauge.</t></dd> <dt>Type = 41: (64-bitGauge) CurrentGauge)</dt><dd><t>Current number of routes in the per-AFI/SAFI post-policyAdj-RIB-OutAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;Out invalidated after verifying the route origin ASN through the ROA of the RPKI <xreftarget="RFC6811" />.target="RFC6811"/>. This is the total number of routes invalidated due toorigin AS numbera mismatch of origin ASNs and a mismatch of prefixlength mismatch. Thelengths.</t><t>The value is structuredas:as a 2-byte AFI, a 1-byte SAFI,followed byand a 64-bitGauge.</t> <t>TypeGauge.</t></dd> <dt>Type = 42: (64-bitGauge) CurrentGauge)</dt><dd><t>Current number of routes in the per-AFI/SAFI post-policyAdj-RIB-OutAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;Out validatedbyafter verifying the route originAS numberASN through the ROA of the RPKI <xreftarget="RFC6811" />. Thetarget="RFC6811"/>.</t><t>The value is structuredas:as a 2-byte AFI, a 1-byte SAFI,followed byand a 64-bitGauge.</t> <t>TypeGauge.</t></dd> <dt>Type = 43: (64-bitGauge) CurrentGauge)</dt><dd><t>Current number of routes in the per-AFI/SAFI post-policyAdj-RIB-OutAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;Out whose RPKI route origin validation state is NotFound due to the absence of a matching ROA of RPKI <xreftarget="RFC6811" />. Thetarget="RFC6811"/>.</t><t>The value is structuredas:as a 2-byte AFI, a 1-byte SAFI,followed byand a 64-bitGauge.</t> </list> </t>Gauge.</t></dd> </dl> </section> </section> <sectionanchor="Applicationanchor="Application_Scope_of_Statistics"> <name>Application Scope ofStatistics" title="Application Scope of Statistics"> <t>This sectionStatistics</name> <t><xref target="tbl-scope-of-application"/> briefly lists the statistics defined in this document and outlines their scope ofapplication, as shown in Table 1.</t>application.</t> <table anchor="tbl-scope-of-application"align="center" pn="table-1"> <name slugifiedName="name-scope-of-application">Scopealign="center"> <name>Scope of Application</name> <thead> <tr> <thalign="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Type</th>align="left">Type</th> <thalign="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Pre-policy Adj-RIB-In</th>align="left">Pre-policy Adj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In</th> <thalign="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Post-policy Adj-RIB-In</th>align="left">Post-policy Adj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In</th> <thalign="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Loc-RIB</th>align="left">Loc-RIB</th> <thalign="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Pre-policy Adj-RIB-Out</th>align="left">Pre-policy Adj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;Out</th> <thalign="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Post-policy Adj-RIB-Out</th>align="left">Post-policy Adj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;Out</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">18</td>align="center">18</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Y</td>align="center">Y</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> </tr> <tr> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">19</td>align="center">19</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Y</td>align="center">Y</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> </tr> <tr> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">20</td>align="center">20</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Y</td>align="center">Y</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> </tr> <tr> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">21</td>align="center">21</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Y</td>align="center">Y</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> </tr> <tr> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">22</td>align="center">22</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Y</td>align="center">Y</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> </tr> <tr> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">23</td>align="center">23</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Y</td>align="center">Y</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> </tr> <tr> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">26</td>align="center">26</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Y</td>align="center">Y</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Y</td>align="center">Y</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> </tr> <tr> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">27</td>align="center">27</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Y</td>align="center">Y</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Y</td>align="center">Y</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> </tr> <tr> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">28</td>align="center">28</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Y</td>align="center">Y</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Y</td>align="center">Y</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> </tr> <tr> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">29</td>align="center">29</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Y</td>align="center">Y</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> </tr> <tr> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">30</td>align="center">30</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Y</td>align="center">Y</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> </tr> <tr> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">31</td>align="center">31</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Y</td>align="center">Y</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Y</td>align="center">Y</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> </tr> <tr> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">32</td>align="center">32</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Y</td>align="center">Y</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Y</td>align="center">Y</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> </tr> <tr> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">33</td>align="center">33</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Y</td>align="center">Y</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> </tr> <tr> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">34</td>align="center">34</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Y</td>align="center">Y</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> </tr> <tr> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">35</td>align="center">35</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Y</td>align="center">Y</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> </tr> <tr> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">36</td>align="center">36</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Y</td>align="center">Y</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> </tr> <tr> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">37</td>align="center">37</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Y</td>align="center">Y</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> </tr> <tr> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">38</td>align="center">38</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Y</td>align="center">Y</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> </tr> <tr> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">39</td>align="center">39</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Y</td>align="center">Y</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> </tr> <tr> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">40</td>align="center">40</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Y</td>align="center">Y</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> </tr> <tr> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">41</td>align="center">41</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Y</td>align="center">Y</td> </tr> <tr> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">42</td>align="center">42</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Y</td>align="center">Y</td> </tr> <tr> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">43</td>align="center">43</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">N</td>align="center">N</td> <tdalign="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Y</td>align="center">Y</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> </section> <sectionanchor="Implementation-Considerations" title="Implementation Considerations">anchor="Implementation-Considerations"> <name>Implementation Considerations</name> <t>This document specifiesgaugesGauges for new BMP statistics. The format of BMPstatisticsStatistics Report messages remains unchanged from <xreftarget="RFC7854" />.target="RFC7854"/>. This section outlines the implementation considerations for new BMP statistics.</t> <t>For backward compatibility, and absentpolicy otherwise,any other policy, it isRECOMMENDED<bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> that BMP producers capable of generating both (Types 7 and 18)orand (Types 9 and 19) BMP statisticsSHOULDtransmit both corresponding types simultaneously. This allows BMP collectors to process either format according to their needs without disrupting existing implementations that rely onTypeTypes 7 orType9. The selection of whichstatisticstatistics types to generate within each pairSHOULD<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be treated as an implementation decision rather than a protocol requirement, with the BMP collector behavior for handling thesestatisticstatistics types remainingimplementation-specific.</t>implementation specific.</t> <t>Some statistics are dependent on feature configurations, such as GR, LLGR, andRPKI, soRPKI; therefore, the corresponding statisticsSHOULD<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> only be generated and sent when these features are enabled on the BMP producer. These statistics includeTypesthe following Types: 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 39, 40, 41, 42, and 43.</t> <t>Some statistics are also relevant for the Loc-RIB view <xreftarget="RFC9069" />, sotarget="RFC9069"/>; therefore, they may apply to the Loc-RIB view after best-path selection is completed. These statistics include Types 26, 27, 28, 31, and 32. When these statistics apply to the Loc-RIB view, thePeer Type"Peer Type" field in the Per-Peer Header of the corresponding BMP Statistics ReportMessage MUSTmessage <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> set to 3.</t> <t>Certain statistics may have logical relationships (e.g., per-AFI/SAFI counts summing to global totals). BMP statistics producers and collectorsMAY<bcp14>MAY</bcp14> perform consistency checks butMUST NOT<bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> assume strict dependencies (due to potential race conditions or partial failures). Discrepancies (e.g., sum(per-AFI/SAFI) != global count)SHOULD<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be logged as warnings butMUST NOT<bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> disrupt protocol operation.</t> <t>The generation and transmission oftypeTypes 27 and 28 during an active GR/LLGR event consumes additional control plane resources (e.g., CPU). BMP statistics producersSHOULD<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> prioritize the core GR/LLGR convergence procedures. To avoid adversely impacting the restart process, a BMP statistics producerMAY<bcp14>MAY</bcp14> choose to sample this value at a lower frequency, buffer the updates, or temporarily suspend reporting for this type during the most critical phases of a switchover.</t> <t>ThesegaugesGauges may reset due to manualclearance,clearance or overflow. BMP statistics producers and collectorsMUST<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> track discontinuities and log this anomaly.</t> </section> <sectionanchor="Operational" title="Operational Considerations">anchor="Operational"> <name>Operational Considerations</name> <t>This section outlines some operational considerations of new BMP statistics for BMP operators.</t> <t>Transmission scheduling and triggering mechanisms for newgaugesGauges areimplementation-dependent.implementation dependent. BMP operatorsSHOULD<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> determine appropriate report generation and delivery strategies, including configurable timing intervals and threshold values. The mechanism for controlling the reporting of newgauges SHOULDGauges <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be consistent with that of existing types.</t> <t>BMP operatorsSHOULD<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> rate-limitstatisticstatistics updates to minimize performance impact oncontrol-planecontrol plane processes. BMP operatorsSHOULD<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> only enable necessary statistics to reduce memory and CPU overhead. ImplementationsSHOULD<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> also support per-router configuration of statistic subsets for collection and reporting.</t> <t>Some BMP statistics producers, or configurations in BMP statistics producers,MAY<bcp14>MAY</bcp14> discard routes that do not matchpolicy and thuspolicy; thus, the accepted count (Type 23) and theAdj-RIB-InAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In counts (Type 21) will be identical in such cases. BMP operatorsSHOULD<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be aware of this behavior when interpreting thesegauges.Gauges. BMP operatorsSHOULD<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be aware that BMP statistics producers and collectorsMAY<bcp14>MAY</bcp14> log inconsistencies between statistics as warnings.</t> </section> <sectionanchor="Security" title="Security Considerations">anchor="Security"> <name>Security Considerations</name> <t>Procedures and protocol extensions defined in this document do not affect the BMP security model. All security and authentication mechanisms required bySection 11 of<xreftarget="RFC7854" />, Section 8 ofsection="11" target="RFC7854"/>, <xreftarget="RFC8671" />,section="8" target="RFC8671"/>, andSection 7 of<xreftarget="RFC9069" />section="7" target="RFC9069"/> are also applicable to thegaugesGauges defined in this document. This document does not add any additional security considerations.</t> <t>Monitored devicesSHOULD<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be configured to implement rate-limited reporting of newgauges.</t>Gauges.</t> </section> <sectionanchor="IANA" title="IANA Considerations">anchor="IANA"> <!--[rfced] We had the following questions/comments related to the IANA Considerations section: a) We will communicate any updates to the descriptions of the Stat types to IANA upon the completion of AUTH48. --> <name>IANA Considerations</name> <t>IANA has assigned the following new parameters in the<eref target="https://www.iana.org/assignments/bmp-parameters/bmp-parameters.xhtml#statistics-types">BMP"BMP StatisticsTypes registry</eref>,Types" registry, part of the <ereftarget="https://www.iana.org/assignments/bmp-parameters/bmp-parameters.xhtml"> BMP parameterstarget="https://www.iana.org/assignments/bmp-parameters/" brackets="angle"> "BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) Parameters" registry group</eref>.</t><t>This document requests IANA to update<t>IANA has listed these entries as follows.Also, theThis documentrequests IANA to update theserves as a referencecitedforthe entries with the RFC number to be assigned to this document.</t> <t> <list style="symbols"> <t>Type = 18: Numbereach entry.</t> <table anchor="tbl-iana-stats-types" align="center"> <name>BMP Statistics Types</name> <thead> <tr> <th align="left">Stat Type</th> <th align="left">Description</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td align="center">18</td> <td>Number of routes currently in the pre-policyAdj-RIB-In.</t> <t>Type = 19: NumberAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In.</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center">19</td> <td>Number of routes currently in the per-AFI/SAFI pre-policyAdj-RIB-In.</t> <t>Type = 20: NumberAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In.</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center">20</td> <td>Number of routes currently in the post-policyAdj-RIB-In.</t> <t>Type = 21: NumberAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In.</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center">21</td> <td>Number of routes currently in the per-AFI/SAFI post-policyAdj-RIB-In.</t> <t>Type = 22: NumberAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In.</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center">22</td> <td>Number of routes currently in the per-AFI/SAFI pre-policyAdj-RIB-InAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In rejected by an inboundpolicy.</t> <t>Type = 23: Numberpolicy.</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center">23</td> <td>Number of routes currently in the per-AFI/SAFI post-policyAdj-RIB-InAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In accepted by an inboundpolicy.</t> <t>Type = 26: Numberpolicy.</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center">26</td> <td>Number of routes currently in the per-AFI/SAFI post-policyAdj-RIB-InAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In or Loc-RIB suppressed by a configuredroute damping policy. </t> <t>Type = 27: Numberroute-damping policy.</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center">27</td> <td>Number of routes currently in the per-AFI/SAFI post-policyAdj-RIB-InAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In or Loc-RIB marked as stale by GRevents.</t> <t>Type = 28: Numberevents.</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center">28</td> <td>Number of routes currently in the per-AFI/SAFI post-policyAdj-RIB-InAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In or Loc-RIB marked as stale byLLGR.</t> <t>Type = 29: NumberLLGR.</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center">29</td> <td>Number of routes currently in the post-policyAdj-RIB-InAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In left before exceeding thereceived route threshold.</t> <t>Type = 30: Numberreceived-route threshold.</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center">30</td> <td>Number of routes currently in the per-AFI/SAFI post-policyAdj-RIB-InAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In left before exceeding thereceived route threshold.</t> <t>Type = 31: Numberreceived-route threshold.</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center">31</td> <td>Number of routes currently in the post-policyAdj-RIB-InAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In or Loc-RIB left before exceeding a license-customized routethreshold.</t> <t>Type = 32: Numberthreshold.</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center">32</td> <td>Number of routes currently in the per-AFI/SAFI post-policyAdj-RIB-InAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In or Loc-RIB left before exceeding a license-customized routethreshold.</t> <t>Type = 33: Numberthreshold.</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center">33</td> <td>Number of routes currently in the pre-policyAdj-RIB-InAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In rejected due to exceeding the locally configured maximum AS_PATHlength.</t> <t>Type = 34: Numberlength.</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center">34</td> <td>Number of routes currently in the per-AFI/SAFI pre-policyAdj-RIB-InAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In rejected due to exceeding the locally configured maximum AS_PATHlength.</t> <t>Type = 35: Numberlength.</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center">35</td> <td>Number of routes currently in the per-AFI/SAFI post-policyAdj-RIB-InAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In invalidated after verifying the route originAS numberASN through the ROA ofRPKI.</t> <t>Type = 36: Numberthe RPKI and mismatch of prefix length.</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center">36</td> <td>Number of routes currently in the per-AFI/SAFI post-policyAdj-RIB-InAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In validated after verifying the route originAS numberASN through the ROA ofRPKI.</t> <t>Type = 37: Numberthe RPKI.</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center">37</td> <td>Number of routes currently in the per-AFI/SAFI post-policyAdj-RIB-InAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;In whose RPKI route origin validation state isNotFound.</t> </list> </t> <t> <list style="symbols"> <t>Type = 38: NumberNotFound.</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center">38</td> <td>Number of routes currently in the per-AFI/SAFI pre-policyAdj-RIB-OutAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;Out rejected by an outboundpolicy.</t> <t>Type = 39: Numberpolicy.</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center">39</td> <td>Number of routes currently in the pre-policyAdj-RIB-OutAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;Out filtered due to AS_PATH length exceeding the locally configuredmaximum.</t> <t>Type = 40: Numbermaximum.</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center">40</td> <td>Number of routes currently in the per-AFI/SAFI pre-policyAdj-RIB-OutAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;Out filtered due to AS_PATH length exceeding the locally configuredmaximum.</t> <t>Type = 41: Numbermaximum.</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center">41</td> <td>Number of routes currently in the per-AFI/SAFI post-policyAdj-RIB-OutAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;Out invalidated after verifying the route originAS numberASN through the ROA ofRPKI.</t> <t>Type = 42: Numberthe RPKI and mismatch of prefix length.</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center">42</td> <td>Number of routes currently in the per-AFI/SAFI post-policyAdj-RIB-OutAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;Out validated after verifying the route originAS numberASN through the ROA ofRPKI.</t> <t>Type = 43: Numberthe RPKI.</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center">43</td> <td>Number of routes currently in the per-AFI/SAFI post-policyAdj-RIB-OutAdj&nbhy;RIB&nbhy;Out whose RPKI route origin validation state isNotFound.</t> </list> </t> </section> <section anchor="Implementation" title="Implementation Status"> <t>Note to the RFC Editor - remove this section before publication, as well as remove the reference to <xref target="RFC7942" />.</t> <t>This section records the status of known implementations of the protocol defined by this specification at the time of posting of this Internet-Draft, and is based on a proposal described in <xref target="RFC7942" />. The description of implementations in this section is intended to assist the IETF in its decision processes in progressing drafts to RFCs. Please note that the listing of any individual implementation here does not imply endorsement by the IETF. Furthermore, no effort has been spent to verify the information presented here that was supplied by IETF contributors. This is not intended as, and must not be construed to be, a catalog of available implementations or their features. Readers are advised to note that other implementations may exist.</t> <t>According to <xref target="RFC7942" />, "this will allow reviewers and working groups to assign due consideration to documents that have the benefit of running code, which may serve as evidence of valuable experimentation and feedback that have made the implemented protocols more mature. It is up to the individual working groups to use this information as they see fit".</t> <section title="Juniper Networks"> <t> <list style="symbols"> <t>Organization: Juniper Networks.</t> <t>Implementation:</t> <t>Description: Below RIB-IN statistics are implemented. <list style="symbols"> <t>Type = 18.</t> <t>Type = 19.</t> <t>Type = 20.</t> <t>Type = 21.</t> <t>Type = 22.</t> <t>Type = 23.</t> <t>Type = 26.</t> <t>Type = 27.</t> <t>Type = 28.</t> <t>Type = 35.</t> <t>Type = 36.</t> <t>Type = 37.</t> </list></t> <t>Maturity Level: Demo</t> <t>Coverage:</t> <t>Version: Draft-05</t> <t>Licensing: N/A</t> <t>Implementation experience: Nothing specific.</t> <t>Contact: msri@juniper.net</t> <t>Last updated: January 20, 2025</t> </list> </t> </section> <section title="New H3C Technologies"> <t> <list style="symbols"> <t>Organization: New H3C Technologies.</t> <t>Implementation: H3C CR16000, CR19000 series routers implementation of New BMP Statistics Type.</t> <t>Description: Below New types have been implemented in above-mentioned New H3C Products (running Version 7.1.086 and above). <list style="symbols"> <t>Type = 18.</t> <t>Type = 19.</t> <t>Type = 20.</t> <t>Type = 21.</t> <t>Type = 22.</t> <t>Type = 23.</t> <t>Type = 29.</t> <t>Type = 30.</t> <t>Type = 31.</t> <t>Type = 32.</t> <t>Type = 33.</t> <t>Type = 34.</t> <t>Type = 35.</t> <t>Type = 36.</t> <t>Type = 37.</t> <t>Type = 38.</t> <t>Type = 39.</t> <t>Type = 40.</t> </list></t> <t>Maturity Level: Demo</t> <t>Coverage:</t> <t>Version: Draft-05</t> <t>Licensing: N/A</t> <t>Implementation experience: Nothing specific.</t> <t>Contact: linchangwang.04414@h3c.com</t> <t>Last updated: January 20, 2025</t> </list> </t> </section> </section> <section anchor="Acknowledgements" title="Acknowledgements"> <t>The author would like to thank Jeff Haas, Mohamed Boucadair, Thomas Graf, and Prasad S. Narasimha for their valuable input.</t> <t>Thanks to Giuseppe Fioccola for the OPSDIR, Jouni Korhonen for the GENART, and Bruno Decraene for the RTGDIR review.</t> <t>Thanks to Gunter van de Velde, Eric Vyncke, and Ketan Talaulikar for the IESG review.</t>NotFound.</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> </section> </middle><!-- *****BACK MATTER ***** --><back><references title="References"> <references title="Normative References"> <!--?rfc include= "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml"?--><references> <name>References</name> <references> <name>Normative References</name> <xi:includehref="https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml" xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" />href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml"/> <xi:includehref="https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2439.xml" xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" />href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2439.xml"/> <xi:includehref="https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4271.xml" xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" />href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4271.xml"/> <xi:includehref="https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4724.xml" xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" /> <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4760.xml" xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" />href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4724.xml"/> <xi:includehref="https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.6811.xml" xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" />href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4760.xml"/> <xi:includehref="https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.7854.xml" xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" /> <!--href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.6811.xml"/> <xi:includehref="https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.7911.xml" xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" />-->href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.7854.xml"/> <xi:includehref="https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8174.xml" xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" />href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8174.xml"/> <xi:includehref="https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8671.xml" xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" />href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8671.xml"/> <xi:includehref="https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9069.xml" xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" />href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9069.xml"/> <xi:includehref="https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9494.xml" xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" />href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9494.xml"/> <reference anchor="IANA-AFI" target="https://www.iana.org/assignments/address-family-numbers"> <front> <title>Address Family Numbers</title> <author> <organization>IANA</organization> </author> </front> </reference> <reference anchor="IANA-SAFI" target="https://www.iana.org/assignments/safi-namespace"> <front> <title>Subsequent Address Family Identifiers (SAFI) Parameters</title> <author> <organization>IANA</organization> </author> </front> </reference> </references><references title="Informative References"> <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.7942.xml" xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" /> </references></references> <section anchor="Acknowledgements" numbered="false"> <name>Acknowledgements</name> <t>The authors would like to thank <contact fullname="Jeff Haas"/>, <contact fullname="Mohamed Boucadair"/>, <contact fullname="Thomas Graf"/>, and <contact fullname="Prasad S. Narasimha"/> for their valuable input.</t> <t>Thanks to <contact fullname="Giuseppe Fioccola"/> for the OPSDIR, <contact fullname="Jouni Korhonen"/> for the GENART, and <contact fullname="Bruno Decraene"/> for the RTGDIR review.</t> <t>Thanks to <contact fullname="Gunter van de Velde"/>, <contact fullname="Éric Vyncke"/>, and <contact fullname="Ketan Talaulikar"/> for the IESG review.</t> </section> </back> </rfc>