<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<!DOCTYPE rfc [
<!ENTITY nbsp "&#160;">
<!ENTITY zwsp "&#8203;">
<!ENTITY nbhy "&#8209;">
<!ENTITY wj "&#8288;">
]>

<rfc xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" ipr="trust200902" docName="draft-ietf-calext-jscontact-uid-07" number="9982" submissionType="IETF" consensus="true" category="std" xml:lang="en" obsoletes="" updates="9555" tocInclude="true" symRefs="true" sortRefs="true" version="3">

  <front>
    <title abbrev="JSContact Version 2.0">JSContact Version 2.0: A JSON Representation of Contact Data</title>
    <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9982"/>
    <author initials="R." surname="Stepanek" fullname="Robert Stepanek">
      <organization>Fastmail</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <extaddr>PO Box 234</extaddr>
          <street>Collins St. West</street>
          <city>Melbourne</city>
          <region>VIC</region>
          <code>8007</code>
          <country>Australia</country>
        </postal>
        <email>rsto@fastmailteam.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <date year="2026" month="May"/>

    <area>ART</area>
    <workgroup>calext</workgroup>

<!-- [rfced] Please insert any keywords (beyond those that appear in
the title) for use on https://www.rfc-editor.org/search. -->

<keyword>example</keyword>

    <abstract>
      <t>This document defines version "2.0" of JSContact. It defines the uid property of a Card object to be optional, rather than mandatory, as defined previously in version "1.0". All other definitions of JSContact version "1.0" remain as defined in RFC 9553. This document updates RFC 9555 by redefining how to convert the now optional uid property from and to vCard. It also registers the vCard JSCOMPS parameter at IANA, which was defined but not registered in RFC 9555.</t>
    </abstract>
  </front>
  <middle>
    <section anchor="introduction" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>Introduction</name>
      <t><xref target="RFC9553">JSContact</xref> defines the Card object uid property, a mandatory property that contains a unique identifier for the entity represented by that contact card. For the same purpose, the <xref target="RFC6350">vCard</xref> contact format defines the UID property, an optional property of a vCard instance. Throughout the rest of this document, the term uid (all lowercase) denotes the JSContact uid property, and the term UID (all uppercase) denotes the vCard UID property.</t>
      <t>The uid property being defined as mandatory in JSContact has shown to be applicable for some use cases but turned out to be an issue in other contexts.</t>
          <t>For example, the <xref target="RFC6352">CardDAV protocol</xref> requires the UID property of a <xref target="RFC6350">vCard object</xref> to be set. Accordingly, an internet server that implements both CardDAV and <xref target="RFC9610">JSON Meta Application Protocol (JMAP) for Contacts</xref> requires the uid property of a JSContact Card to be set. In contrast, protocols such as <xref target="RFC9083">Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP)</xref> have no use for the uid property, either because they use different identifiers or they prefer to not include any unique identifier in the contact data at all. JSContact should not require them to generate unique identifiers that are irrelevant to their use case.</t>
          <t>Also, one of the stated goals of JSContact is to be compatible with the semantics of the vCard data format (<xref target="RFC9553" section="1"/>). But <xref target="RFC6350"/> defines the UID property of a vCard to be optional, and consequently, the semantics of JSContact and vCard differ for such a crucial common element.</t>
        <t>In case of vCards without a UID property (<xref target="RFC6350" section="6.7.6"/>) being converted to JSContact, requiring unique identifiers is especially problematic: The Card uid property is mandatory, and accordingly, <xref target="RFC9555" section="2.1.1"/> requires implementations to generate some unique identifier for it during conversion, but it does not guarantee it to be the same across implementations or even one implementation converting the same Card multiple times. A recipient being unaware that the uid property value of such a Card object is ephemeral might refer to it in the members property or relatedTo property of another Card object, introducing invalid relations between contact cards.</t>
    </section>    
    <section anchor="notational-conventions" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>Notational Conventions</name>
        <t>
    The key words "<bcp14>MUST</bcp14>", "<bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHALL</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHALL
    NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14>", "<bcp14>NOT RECOMMENDED</bcp14>",
    "<bcp14>MAY</bcp14>", and "<bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14>" in this document are to be interpreted as
    described in BCP&nbsp;14 <xref target="RFC2119"/> <xref target="RFC8174"/> 
    when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.
        </t>

      <t>The ABNF definitions in this document use the notations of <xref target="RFC5234"/>. ABNF rules not defined in this document are defined in either <xref target="RFC5234"/> (such as the ABNF for CRLF, WSP, DQUOTE, VCHAR, ALPHA, and DIGIT) or <xref target="RFC6350"/>.</t>
    </section>
    <section>
      <name>JSContact Version 2.0</name>
      <t>This document redefines the uid property of a Card object to become optional. Other than that, the property definition is left unchanged. This change requires the major version of JSContact to change, so this document defines the JSContact version to become "2.0". For further information about versioning JSContact data, see <xref target="RFC9553" section="1.9"/>.</t>
      <t>Implementations <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> create JSContact data that complies with the definitions of version "2.0" (or some later registered version) and <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> set the version property of the JSContact Card object to that version. They <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> reject a Card object without the uid property as invalid unless specified differently in another document or unless the Card version property has value "1.0". As any valid version "1.0" JSContact Card is also valid according to version "2.0", there is no need to migrate existing JSContact data.</t>
      <t>Setting the uid property is use case specific. If an implementation is able to consistently generate the exact same unique identifier for a JSContact Card representing the same entity and no protocol-specific concerns prevail, it is recommended to set the uid property.</t>
      <t>This document does not redefine the vCard UID property.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="redefined-uid-property" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>Redefined uid Property</name>
      <t>This document redefines the type signature of the uid property, originally defined in <xref target="RFC9553" section="2.1.9"/>.</t>

      <t>OLD:</t>
      <blockquote><strong>uid: String (mandatory).</strong></blockquote>
      
      <t>NEW:</t>
      <blockquote><strong>uid: String (optional).</strong></blockquote>

      <t>The remaining property definition is left unchanged, with the following additional paragraph:</t>
      <blockquote>
        <t>A Card without an uid property cannot be referred to as a group member in the members property (<xref target="RFC9553" section="2.1.6"/>) or put in relation to another Card object in the relatedTo property (<xref target="RFC9553" section="2.1.8"/>).</t>
      </blockquote>
    </section>
    <section anchor="redefined-uid-property-conversion" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>Redefined Conversion Rule for the uid Property</name>
      <t>This document redefines how to convert the Card uid property from vCard, originally defined in <xref target="RFC9555" section="2.1.1"/>. The new conversion rule is as follows:</t>
      <t>Implementations that convert a vCard without a UID property (<xref target="RFC6350" section="6.7.6"/>) to a Card of version "2.0" or higher <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> generate a unique identifier as a value for the uid property (<xref target="RFC9553" section="2.1.9"/>).</t>
      <t>When converting a vCard without a UID property to JSContact version "1.0", implementations <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> generate a value for the uid property. Generating unique identifiers is implementation specific. An implementation <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> generate the same value when generating the same Card multiple times. <xref target="introduction"/> describes why this is problematic. Consequently, implementations <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> convert to version "1.0" Card objects.</t>
    </section>
    <section>
        <name>Other Changes</name>
	<t>This document also registers the JSCOMPS parameter in the IANA "vCard Parameters" registry. The parameter was defined in <xref target="RFC9555" section="3.3.1"/> but mistakenly not registered at IANA.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="iana-considerations" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>IANA Considerations</name>
      <section>
        <name>Update to the JSContact Version Registry</name>
        <t>IANA has updated the "JSContact Version" registry, originally created in <xref target="RFC9553" section="3.4"/>, by adding the following record:</t>
        <table anchor="tab-iana-version-registry" align="center">
          <name>JSContact Version Registry</name>
          <thead>
            <tr>
              <th align="left">Major Version</th>
              <th align="left">Highest Minor Version</th>
              <th align="left">Reference</th>
            </tr>
          </thead>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td align="left">2</td>
              <td align="left">0</td>
              <td align="left">RFC 9982</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </section>
      <section>
        <name>Update to the JSContact Properties Registry</name>
        <t>IANA has updated the "JSContact Properties" registry, originally created in <xref target="RFC9553" section="3.5"/>: In the "Reference/Description" column of the uid property, a reference to <xref target="redefined-uid-property"/> of this document has been added.</t>
      </section>
      <section>
        <name>Update to the vCard Parameters Registry</name>
        <t>IANA has updated the "vCard Parameters" registry within the "vCard Elements" registry group by adding the following entry:</t>
        <table anchor="tab-iana-vcard-parameter-registry" align="center">
          <name>vCard Parameters Registry</name>
          <thead>
            <tr>
              <th align="left">Namespace</th>
              <th align="left">Parameter</th>
              <th align="left">Reference</th>
            </tr>
          </thead>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td align="left"></td>
              <td align="left">JSCOMPS</td>
              <td align="left"><xref target="RFC9555" section="3.3.1" sectionFormat="of"/></td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="security-considerations" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>Security Considerations</name>
      <t>This document does not provide new security considerations. The security considerations of <xref target="RFC9553" section="4" sectionFormat="of"/> apply.</t>
    </section>
  </middle>
  <back>
    <references>
      <name>References</name>
      <references>
        <name>Normative References</name>
        <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5234.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.6350.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8174.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9553.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9555.xml"/>
      </references>
      <references>
        <name>Informative References</name>
        <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.6352.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9083.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9610.xml"/>
      </references>
    </references>
  </back>
<!-- [rfced] FYI - We have added expansions for the following abbreviations                               
per Section 3.6 of RFC 7322 ("RFC Style Guide"). Please review each                                  
expansion in the document carefully to ensure correctness.      

 JSON Meta Application Protocol (JMAP)
 Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP)
-->

 <!-- [rfced] Please review the "Inclusive Language" portion of the online
Style Guide <https://www.rfc-editor.org/styleguide/part2/#inclusive_language>
and let us know if any changes are needed.  Updates of this nature typically
result in more precise language, which is helpful for readers. 

Note that our script did not flag any words in particular, but this should 
still be reviewed as a best practice.
-->

</rfc>
